Copyright © 2016. All Rights Reserved.
The Electoral College
Large, densely populated cities (NYC, Chicago, LA, etc.)
do not, and should not, speak for the rest of our country.
... and somehow the geniuses who founded our country understood this and created a system to avoid that circumstance.
Now you understand the supreme importance of the Electoral College.
The founding fathers were really smart guys.
After this lesson, is there anyone who doubts the foresight of our Founding Fathers and the validity of the Electoral College, especially in our modern age of demographics?
This is the best example of why the Founding Fathers created with amazing foresight the wisdom the Electoral College....
WHY IS THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE SO IMPORTANT?
In their infinite wisdom, the founders of our country created a structure called the "Electoral College" as a control system and to ensure the individual states were fairly represented.
Otherwise one or two densely populated areas would speak for the whole of the nation.
It was not created as a device to favor Democrats, Republicans, Whigs, Tories or any other political affiliation.
It was created as a system of "checks and balances" to guard against any small vocal area, with a specific agenda, speaking for the whole of the nation.
The following list of statistics should put an end to the argument as to why the Electoral College makes sense:
There are 3,141 counties in the United States.
Trump won 3,084 (98.2%).
Clinton won 57 ( 1.8%).
There are 62 counties in New York State.
Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.
Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC
(Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens)
Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump.
In other words, these Five (5) counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote for the entire country!
The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles.
These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles
(1/12,000th of the total).
When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election.
Should 99.9916% of the country
be controlled by 0.0084% of it?
(only 1/12,000th of the area)